There is such a thing as fair banking

March 1st, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

Fair Banking are a charity who have recently reviewed the products on offer from the UK financial services market to see if there are any out there designed to help people manage and stay on top of their money.

Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be many that come up to scratch, but I am extremely proud that our Goal Saver product is according to Fair Banking the best product on the market.

The product which was developed after some small focus groups and an online “facebook” style research panel that ran for three months, told us that people need motivation to save. They need to be able to work out how much they can afford to save, want to personalise their savings goals and be able to change and evolve their plans as circumstances do. Our initial Goal Saver then spawned our brilliant new Wedding tool and will be followed by a car savings tool later this year.

I was of course very happy to get the PR that goes with being the UK’s top rated and most of all I am proud that innovation in the financial product landscape has in this instance come from a Regional Mutual, not a large provider with deep pockets.

The product was featured on Saturday’s Moneybox programme on Radio 4 and also in the Weekend FT. Links to both are below for anyone interested and the Moneybox section is approximately 13 minutes into the programme.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/6e44b898-2307-11df-a25f-00144feab49a.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00qylpq/Money_Box_27_02_2010/

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Misleading journalism

February 24th, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

It was rather sad today to see the UK’s oldest building society declare its merger with Skipton. I have no doubt that the Chesham will be missed by both its members and the community it serves. It is also a shame that some journalist try and create links that don’t exist, such as Mark Kleinman at Sky News who put out a blog about building societies investigating shared services with an inference around mergers.

 

I feel so strongly about the misleading mature of his piece that I felt compelled to let him know and below is an extract from the email I sent him. I wonder if he will take me up on my offer.

 

I read your item with interest, but am disappointed at the potential for it to mislead through the use of words such as merger.

It is also a shame that this item was run without prior reference to me, as I would have happily provided more information on my views on the Building Society Sector sharing services for the purposes of reducing management expenses. In fact I have been an advocate of such an approach since I became CEO at Saffron. I am speaking on this very subject at the forthcoming BSA annual conference in May and I was also part of the Treasury expert group which reviewed a number of potential avenues, including pooled funding, shared operating platforms and shared procurement. In addition Saffron has already successfully worked with other Societies for cost advantage in areas such as bulk purchasing and training and development.

However I cannot agree with your inference that the desire to find more cost effective ways of doing business is a sign of weakness brought on by the current financial crisis. In fact I believe it to be a core part of my fiduciary responsibility as a Building Society Leader to investigate any potential opportunity to gain greater efficiency and therefore return greater value to my members. My Boards grasp and support for such a cause is in my view a sign of strength.

Let me assure you we are committed to remaining a dynamic and independent mutual, providing a different choice to our members than that available from the faceless shareholder driven banks. When our 2009 results are released they will demonstrate the strength of the society with strong profits, improved arrears performance and greater costs efficiency than before through a continuing trend of reduced management expenses ratio’s. However none of this means we shouldn’t continue to seek ways to keep the mutual model evolving and seeking out new ways to enhance our competitive edge through greater efficiency; but for me this is about creation, not consolidation, which brings me back to my initial concerns around the way your article reads.

If you would like more information, I am happy to have a chat with you, just let me know.

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Let’s get married….

February 18th, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

n600773026_822919_50854I am really excited about our new Plan, Save, Get Married service which has now gone live. In partnership with Wedding Magazine, this website allows couples to plan their wedding and save up for different aspects – basically with a view to starting married life happily and debt free! Visit www.weddingmagazine.co.uk/saffron to find out more.

 

I’m the first to admit that I’m no expert when it comes to weddings, so I’m introducing a guest on my blog. Cherrelle Varley is one of our Saffron Direct Contact Centre team, and I’m sure many of our members have had the pleasure of speaking to her over the last couple of years. Most of us at Saffron are aware that she’s getting married this year, which gives you an idea of how excited she is about her wedding! I’m handing over to her to tell you about Plan, Save, Get Married. As our first account-opener, I can think of no one better…

 

—–

Pete and I met when I was working in the Baraccuda pub in Royston. He came in to see me all the time and it sort of went from there. I used to go to see him after my shift and before long I was at his place more than mine, so I moved in. Four months later we were watching ‘Juno’ and having a korma and he got out the most beautiful engagement ring I’ve ever seen and asked me to marry him! That was the night before I started working at Saffron so everyone at Saffron probably thinks I’m wedding mad….

 

Pete and I are getting married on 10th September in a 5 star hotel in Cyprus. There are 22 people coming out with us – all family and our very closest friends. Then when we get back we’re having a big party with 150 guests at the local golf club – like the evening reception but a bit later on.

 

When it comes to the money, obviously we’re saving a bit by not having a big church wedding with cars and a dozen bridesmaids, but going abroad and having a UK reception isn’t cheap. His parents have helped us out with a contribution to the wedding itself. My mum is paying for the wedding cake and my dad is paying for my dress, which is brilliant, but we’ve still got to get to and from Cyprus, have enough money to enjoy our time out there, and pay for the reception when we get back. The most expensive thing for the wedding is definitely the reception food – it’s just a buffet but we have to pay for about 150 people to eat, so it’s quite a lot of money to find.

 

As it’s only seven months away, we have quite a lot organised already; pretty much everything apart from the reception décor and food. The golf club is quite dated so I’m going to work hard to make it special inside. Pete’s letting me go the whole hog on the party because it’s the one chance I have to be a wedding planner and we’ll have all the extras that we can afford!

 

I’m the first one to get married in my group of friends, and weddings in my family have been quite low-key; generally a registry office and reception afterwards. So no one knew how to do a church wedding or how to go about getting married abroad. Without anyone to ask, I have been using the internet and magazines for all my wedding planning, and the magazines have been costing me a fortune! I do buy four every month… If there had been a website with all of the information in one place, it would have been much less stressful and expensive and I found I especially needed some good advice on when you have to organise different parts of your wedding. I think it’s brilliant that Plan, Save, Get Married comes with emails telling you that sort of thing listing it all out for you.

 

I’m helping to promote Plan, Save, Get Married at the National Wedding Fair in London this weekend and am really really excited about it. For a bride-to-be, it is amazing! If I couldn’t go with work I was going to try and get tickets for it. It’s a bit different for someone getting married abroad but I still really wanted to go. I’m going to be looking for nice things for the reception and basically grabbing everything that I can. I’d also like to look at Groom’s outfits because I want Pete to look smart on the beach – or I’m going to look stupid in a wedding dress.  I am giving his mum quite specific instructions about what he should wear!

 

The thing I really like about Plan, Save, Get Married is that you can upload your pictures and bring them all together on the moodboard. You can log in and show people the different dresses you’re thinking about and get their opinions. It saves so much cutting out and glue, and lugging around a massive scrapbook file – your friends see you coming and think ‘nooo, not the file again!’! I’ve chosen my dress now, but for Pete’s outfit it’ll be great to bring ‘ideas’ to him and his mum.

 

The savings part of the website is the bit that I’d have found most useful.  Pete and I have found it really hard to keep track of our money for the wedding, especially with the gifts from people and the fact that we’ve got it in lots of different accounts. Some is in current accounts as well, so we’ve accidentally used some of that for other things. I think we could have managed it much better if we’d had the Wedding Saver account from the beginning. But I’m really chuffed that I have a Wedding Saver now. I’m still saving up for the reception, obviously, but also for spending money when we’re out in Cyprus because I want to enjoy our holiday and our wedding without worrying about not having the money. It’s going to be brilliant and I can’t wait!

 

You can find out all about Plan, Save, Get Married at www.weddingmagazine.co.uk/saffron.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Buy to let mortgage regulation – good or bad?

February 16th, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

 

I have watched and been involved in the debate over the last few years about the potential to regulate buy to let mortgage lending. In fact as a member of the board of the Council of Mortgage Lenders, it is a subject we have discussed vigorously, with differing views around the table.

 

Regulation should be about protection and therefore for example on residential mortgages I am fully supportive of it. The regulation of these products should protect consumers from borrowing more that they can afford or entering into contractual terms that they do not understand. It should also aim to prevent miss selling through process disclosure and sales processes that ensure the borrower’s attitude to things like interest rates and future certainty are taken into account. All good common sense for such a large financial commitment; for most of us in fact the largest financial commitment we will ever make.

 

Buy to let is different though in my view. A borrower wanting to finance property investment or speculation through this type of mortgage is after all entering into a business transaction. They should be taking into account the cost of maintaining the rental property, the rentability of their chosen investment and the actual rent achievable versus the cost of financing the transaction and any resultant tax liability. As with any venture the risks need careful consideration too. What if you have voids between tenants, how will you fund any mortgage commitment? This is all advice that should be taken from professional sources outside of the mortgage transaction.

 

It is the lender’s responsibility to provide a product priced appropriately for risk, and carry out suitable valuations and borrower and rental assessment to ensure that the transaction stacks up, but getting into the ’should you shouldn’t you’ debate is in my view outside of the lender’s remit.

 

Buy to let is a long term capital gain and income generating investment and should be entered into by those who have the acumen to manage such a proposition. Unfortunately as with so many investments that have had a good track record of generating returns, it became fashionable and therefore was entered into by many who did not think through exactly what being a landlord actually means. In fact even the FSA refer to some as dinner party landlords, i.e. those who met someone doing it so thought they would too.

 

In my view regulating the pre and post purchase elements of buy to let is where the effort should be focused. A license application system covering a quasi business plan and a treating tenants fairly policy would be in my view, much more beneficial to the private rental industry than regulating buy to let mortgages.

 

Regulation should be about protecting consumers from unscrupulous firms or practices – not about protecting them from themselves.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

What will happen if interest rates rise?

February 4th, 2010 posted by: admin

Questions are being asked about the future of rates - it’s not every day that Saffron get a mention on the BBC! You can view the article here.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

The balance of responsibility….

February 3rd, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

A couple of letters have come across my desk from Society members complaining about the interest they have received on one particular savings account with us.

 

The account in question is called Cashbuild 60. It was a traditional branch based account with 60 days notice required for penalty free withdrawal. The account has never paid as much as lower cost internet accounts or indeed ISA’s or bonds, but with base rates at an all time low its rate of interest became pretty derisory.

 

Between October 2008 and April 2009, the interest rate on the lowest balances reduced by 3.9%, although in the same period, Base Rate reduced by 4%. By July 2009 we had decided to make the product a closed issue (i.e. we decided to stop opening new accounts, but continue to service existing ones) as we had introduced a number of other products in our branches that were significantly more competitive.

 

The basis of both complaints is not just the rate, but the fact that we had not told the individuals personally about the rate reductions and that the products were now closed issues; which leaves me stuck between a sense of perhaps we could have done more vs. we do all that we can to keep members up to date with product changes.

 

Outside of the annual statement and full years rate details which we send out, all our product rates are available on posters in our branches and agencies and on our website. Additionally we advertise in a range of newspapers covering our catchment area whenever interest rates change. Last year we set up a new product registration service which allows members to register for emails informing them of new products and this year our branch staff have been under instruction to and worked hard to speak to members in lower paying accounts to make sure they are aware of our better offers.  In addition, we don’t have “new customer only” products; all our products are openly available to existing members and is some cases with better rates than for new ones.

 

We have not written to members individually to make them aware of rate changes, quite simply because the expense would have been prohibitive – something around £50,000 every time there was a rate change.  I do, however, think we have been sufficiently visible on rate changes and I do have a view that with the lowest base rates ever seen in this country, consumers have some responsibility to keep tabs on what rates are available from their providers. 

 

That said, I am exercising my mind on how we do what’s right here and we will therefore be increasing the volume on our new product email service and continuing to ensure that our branch and telephone staff are talking to members in lower paying accounts and letting them know what else we have available

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Sharing services for cost and efficiency

January 19th, 2010 posted by: Andy Golding

What building societies are good at are customer relationships. There are still 51 of us left in the UK and each society, whether national, a regional player like Saffron or a single branch local society has its own distinct personality and its own loyal membership base.

 

That said I am not sure you could say that building societies are the most efficient animals in the world. That is not because we don’t have the skills to be efficient, but more a function of a deep mutual believe that members and customers are the most important part of the business. Our members do own us after all.

 

Shareholder and profit maximising firms have long been managing continuous improvement, waste elimination and cost efficiency in their businesses, but many would argue that these efficiencies have been at the expense of customer service. All too often it is impossible to speak to the same member of staff twice, interaction is driven by scripts for the call centre staff and processes are just a little too robotic for my liking.

 

Most of us in the building society sector have focused hard on making our processes slicker but have resisted those at the sharp end, believing that customer interaction should be as personal as possible; but lack of automation and the breadth of training required to let staff actually converse rather than read a script, all add cost and arguably make us less efficient.

 

So what of the future? Can building societies find ways to save cost in order to continue to spend money on those critical customer interactions? Well I think we will have to. We are already at a structural disadvantage to the banks, due to our limited ways of raising capital. It is also fair to say that post the “global economic meltdown” the regulatory environment will get more stringent and this will undoubtedly add cost to running a regulated business. I don’t want Saffron’s’ members to have to pay through lower value products, so for me there has to be another way.

 

For 3 years now I have been talking in and around the sector about shared services as a route to a reduced cost base, but until now whilst others have liked the idea, none enough to take the plunge. I for one really struggle to understand why.

 

By shared services I mean joining forces with other mutuals to provide all the services that don’t influence the personality of the society. Things like procurement, IT equipment, payroll and some back office processes.

 

The Treasury have now said this is good idea and are keen to push the sector to investigate things further. In fact I am at a meeting at the House of Commons this week to discuss this very topic.

 

Shared services works in other countries, Germany has some good examples amongst its smaller banks; the Australian mutual sector does a lot of it. If they can make it work, we can too, I am sure of it.

 

I am continuing to bang the drum around the sector; I call it a GOBO (glimpse of the blindingly obvious).

 

I want to focus on what make Saffron different and share the cost and benefits of scale with others for those things that are very necessary but do not differentiate us like our staff and our relationships do.

 

 

 

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

One farmer, a Land Rover Discovery and a very kind lady in a Honda 4×4

December 18th, 2009 posted by: Andy Golding

I am stupid sometimes, I should have not attempted the 80 mile trip to the office in such snowy conditions, but I have always had a sort of principle thing that says if the boss doesn’t make the effort to get in, why should the staff.

 

So once I had swept off the snow and defrosted the car, I duly left home at about 6-50am and drove delicately through the snowy scenes before me.

 

I was doing quite well too, until I entered Bedfordshire and then Hertfordshire and the snow seemed to get deeper and more resilient with each passing mile. The A507 was a car park, the A505 was too and there were lots of abandoned vehicles that had just been unable to make headway.

 

Determined to press on I turned out of the A505 jams just past Royston to follow my normal route through the villages into Saffron Walden.

 

Now my car is a 4 wheel drive (Quattro is the brand name for it) and that gave me some false sense of security that it would be capable of going where 2 wheel drive cars may struggle, but on a narrow stretch of road, the car decided that it wanted to face a different direction from that which I intended.

 

Now I count myself as an experienced driver, I average 45,000 miles per annum and always adjust my driving style to suit conditions, so as the car started to slide I did all the right things, I eased of the accelerator, steered into the skid and assumed that the Quattro system would do its magic, but no. Seconds later and very slowly and gracefully the car came to rest sideways across the road with both front and back wedged in deep snow.

 

I did what anyone would do in these circumstances, decided not to bother the AA on such a busy day and walked off to see if I could find a friendly farmer with a suitable tow vehicle.

 

After a short time a very kind lady with a Honda 4×4 stopped as I was walking. She had a tow rope (new and unused) and a shovel. So we dug a bit, connected the rope and pulled – nothing happened. Then a chap with a discovery turned up and this was able to do the deed. I was free.

 

These people were really nice at a time I needed help and eminently better prepared than I was. In fact soon after we all got going again, we all had to provide a push to another car struggling to make an incline, but with team work we made it happen. I made it to the office nearly 4 and half hours after leaving home.

 

Learning points for me? People are genuinely kind and rally together when needed and……carry a spade, rope and wellies in the car when snowing, or better still don’t use the car if the conditions out match it.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Questions to ask your building society

December 15th, 2009 posted by: Andy Golding

The Mail on Sunday Newspaper has a long history of unrivalled coverage of the mutual sector and last weekend was no exception. As we move towards most societies financial year end, the paper advocated that society members should ask their society boards some well thought through questions regarding the financial stability and future of individual societies, as well as satisfying themselves that directors pay is appropriate in the context of the market and society performance.

 

The MOS published a template including some of the key questions to ask on its website http://www.thisismoney.co.uk and as a society who firmly believes in providing as much information to members as possible; I thought it would be good to publish Saffron’s answers to those suggested questions. So here they are below and you will see from final paragraph I am always happy to speak to members or prospective members who would like more information.

 

Before you read on though, if you plan to, may I take this opportunity to wish you all a very good Christmas on behalf of Saffron Building Society. As with the last few years we have again made a donation to East Anglia Children’s Hospices instead of sending cards, but our e-card is available to view through this link http://each-newsletters.org.uk/2009ChristmasCard/Saffron/

 

 

MOS questions and answers:

 

Can Saffron afford to remain independent?

 

Saffron Building Society can confirm that it is profitable and well capitalised, with measures in place to ensure that it is prepared for any further financial downturn. Having served the local community for the last 160 years, it is fully committed to safeguarding members’ interests long in to the future.

 

The society remains profitable as a result of careful planning and aversion to risk. To be in profit following 12 months of challenging conditions is an achievement, of which we are very proud. This represents a strong performance in the context of the overall market.

 

After payment of FSCS levies, Saffron made £1.1m profit in 2008 and whilst 2009 results are not yet finalised we can confirm that our profit for this year will substantially exceed the 2008 figure.  Our projections for 2010 are also that that Society remains strongly profitable.

 

In addition the society’s capital ratio sits at 16.5% (well above the industry average) with 12.4% of this deemed to be tier 1 capital (the strongest possible).

 

Where have the Society’s cost pressures come from?

                                                                   

The society’s cost base is well under control and our management expenses ratio has been improving in recent years to a now creditable 0.76% at the end of November. That said like others we have faced additional costs outside of our control.

 

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme levies have impacted on large and small building societies alike. This levy has been raised to compensate savers who lost money through the failed Icelandic banks and the collapse of Bradford and Bingley. Building Societies have to make payments for the next three years, despite being prudently run.

 

This has been coupled with a margin squeeze caused by unprecedented low interest rates.  The Society is a net saver – that is our savings balances exceed our mortgage balances – and we too have suffered from the fall in interest rates as the return we get on these excess savings balances has fallen.

 

In remaining independent, are Saffron still able to offer competitive rates to both existing and new members?

 

Over the course of 2009 we have featured in national ‘Best Buy’ tables for both our savings and mortgage products. Our local First Time Buyer product was extremely popular, and other notable products included our 7% Regular Saver ISA, 2 and 3 Year Fixed rate ISAs and our online Goal Saver account – all of them extremely competitive and open to new and existing members alike. We will be upholding this commitment to competitive products in to 2010.

 

It is our duty to offer rates that are both competitive and sustainable. Accounts such as our Reward Saver move away from short-term bonuses and towards realistic rewards for members in the current low-rate climate.

 

With base rate held at a historic low for most of 2009, rates have of course, not been as high as in previous years – a rate of 2% is now 4 times base rate, and it is not viable to hold all rates above base rate. We have taken care to protect rates for members who most rely on their savings income – such as our over 55 account and our Cashbuild 90 which is used by many retired savers.

 

What steps are you taking to ensure that Saffron survives the current financial pressures?

 

We have a robust level of provision for bad and doubtful debt to protect the Society in case of a worsening economic climate. We have stress-tested our mortgage books; another 40% fall in house prices would still leave us adequately capitalised.

 

We entered 2009 knowing that margins were likely to tighten and have exercised additional caution throughout the year in terms of careful management of our products and our investments portfolio.

 

Whilst we have seen an increase in our savings balances we have remained cautious and not been over zealous in our mortgage lending in the knowledge that the housing market and employment situation are likely to remain under pressure.  

 

 

 

 

Will directors be taking salary increases or bonuses this year?

 

Current remuneration of both Executive and Non-Executive Directors is benchmarked against the wider market and Building Society Sector and is consistent with our asset size and performance.

 

Directors voluntarily accepted a zero increase in basic salaries in 2009 to maintain that link to the wider market. 

 

Directors are eligible to earn bonuses, based on a set of board agreed balanced business scorecard measures. There is currently a short term annual bonus scheme and a medium term scheme which is deferred in payment for 3 years to encourage long term performance and assist with retention.  Bonus paid in 2009 will be based on 2008 and 2006 performance measure in accordance with the short and medium term nature of the schemes.

 

A review of bonus schemes is near completion.  This is likely to remove short term bonuses in their entirety beyond those payable in 2010 for 2009 achievements.

 

What is Saffron’s exposure to risk on the basis of recent business activities (sub prime lending, commercial lending, wholesale markets, etc).

 

Mortgage lending

The majority of our mortgage portfolio is prime residential and our exposure to commercial lending is both minimal and diminishing; it currently represents only 0.75% of our loan book. 

 

We set out to lend very modestly during 2009 and have stuck to that.  We have stuck to prime residential lending throughout the year, including a small amount of local first time buyer loans.  Our overall loan book therefore remains low risk.


Arrears

At the end of November our arrears with balances of 2.5% or more outstanding was 0.27% - substantially below the CML average of 1.77% and represent an excellent performance by our arrears team and the quality nature of our mortgage book.

 

Wholesale Markets

The rules governing Building Societies dictates that they cannot raise more than 50% of their funds from the wholesale money markets. Saffron’s wholesale funding currently sits at around 12%. However we do not use this type of funding to make mortgage loans. Our retail savings balances are significantly in excess of our mortgage balances.

 

What is Saffron’s credit rating?

Smaller building societies such as Saffron do not have a credit rating as it is not seen as beneficial to a society of our size. The largest societies hold credit ratings but it is not deemed necessary for a society such as Saffron. Members are welcome to review our Report and Accounts for 2008 (which have been recently published) and make enquires regarding our financial standing at any time. We endeavour to answer all enquiries thoroughly and honestly.

 

 

 

I still have concerns about Saffron. Who can I talk to?

 

Our Chief Executive Andy Golding and his Executive Team are always happy to talk to members and are committed to transparency and openness regarding Saffron’s financial situation and its dealings with members. If you would like to speak to one of the Executive, please call us on 01799 522211 and ask to speak to Linda Buck.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

The pre-budget report, is it fair?

December 10th, 2009 posted by: Andy Golding

Well I think it is fair to say that Alastair Darling wasn’t exactly sporting a red suit and long beard when he delivered his report. In fact some may say he was dressed rather more as the grim reaper. But what of the context?

 

The last 2 years have probably seemed bumpy to most of us, and for those that have religiously followed the press reporting of the financial crisis, possibly even sensationalist. However I am still not sure that most of us truly grasp the catastrophic nature of the global meltdown. 

 

Any Spook fans may well have watched last night’s episode and the rather dramatic account of the UK sovereignty on the brink of bankruptcy due to an inability to meet its short term funding requirements. Ok so it may have been a little far fetched, but possibly not as far as we may think.

 

Someone told me recently (and I can’t remember who so I am not betraying any confidence) that there was a discussion about shutting down the entire UK ATM network during the eye of the financial storm. Just imagine how that would have felt.

 

So we all now face a pretty long and uphill struggle to put the UK economy back on an even footing and which ever way we look at it, there is a £180bn of debt that needs to be repaid – that is equal to about £40,000 per household, so no Chancellor is going to be giving away much in the way of gifts for some years to come.

 

The announcements in the report will effectively levy over £7bn of tax increases on the middle classes and better off. But I am sure there will be more to come; there will have to be to tackle the scale of such debt.

 

So what else could be coming, regardless of which government is in power from next May? Well putting VAT up to 20% would yield an extra £12.5bn, 2p increase in basic rate tax and extra £9bn, double duty on beer and wine £5bn and the abolition of tax relief for savings and investments such as ISA’s and extra £3bn.

 

None of us know what may be coming next, but we are between a rock and a hard place. The report is in my view just the start of things to come and I’m sorry to say that I think this recession will leave its scar on us all for many years and in real terms, as is unfortunately always the case, the lowest paid will feel it worst.

 

Fair? I don’t know, but the alternatives would have been even more unpalatable. Without state support for the failed banks the knock on effect could have crippled the rest. What did they say on Spooks last night? Britain would have become a third world country. Ok maybe a touch over dramatic – but having had a buoyant and growing economy based on borrowing, we all have no choice but to start making the repayments.

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!